MFE Skills — плагин

---
name: reviewing-mfe-boundaries
description: Reviews and generates micro-frontend code against eight boundary rules from Building Micro-Frontends (O'Reilly), plus governance extensions for feature-flag scope, edge strategy, SSR ownership, and boundary fitness functions. Use when a user says "review my shell code", "is this a boundary violation?", "generate a Module Federation shell", "how do I mount this MFE?", "review my micro-frontend architecture", "set up event communication between MFEs", "create a new micro-frontend", "how should we use edge with MFEs?", "where should feature flags live?", or "how do I enforce boundaries in a monorepo?". Loads automatically when the user pastes shell integration code, Module Federation config, Single SPA registration, or Native Federation routes. Does not activate for component-level code within a single deployed unit, or for generic React, Vue, or Angular questions with no cross-team deployment angle.
license: "MIT — Copyright (c) Luca Mezzalira"
compatibility: Works in Claude.ai, Claude Code, and any Claude API environment. No external tools or MCP servers required. Covers React, Angular, Vue with Module Federation v1/v2, Native Federation, and Single SPA toolchains.
metadata:
  author: luca-mezzalira
  version: "1.0"
  category: architecture
  tags: [micro-frontends, module-federation, native-federation, single-spa, angular, react, boundary-governance, edge-compute, ssr, feature-flags, fitness-functions]
---

# MFE boundary health

Reviews and generates micro-frontend code against the eight boundary rules from *Building Micro-Frontends* (O'Reilly). All rules are tool-agnostic. Full rule definitions, violation signals, and code-checkable patterns are in `references/rules-core-critical.md` (rules 3 and 4) and `references/rules-core-standard.md` (rules 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8). Load the file that covers the rule you need.

**On every activation, apply this summary table directly — no file load needed:**

| Rule | What to check in code | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Business subdomain | Name reflects a business capability, not a UI element | High |
| 2 — Minimal API surface | Fewer than 5 props; no full domain objects passed | Critical |
| 3 — Hide implementation details | No direct imports from another MFE's internals | Critical |
| 4 — Events not shared state | No shared store; shell handles `shell:*` only; domain events peer-to-peer or URL | Critical |
| 5 — Independent deployment | No versioned URLs in shell config; no build-time MFE imports; no CI pipeline coupling | High |
| 6 — Isolate failure | Every remote mount has a fallback in the shell | High |
| 7 — Coarse-grained | Nesting depth > 1 (MFE inside MFE); more than 3 MFEs per view | High |
| 8 — Single-team ownership | One team in CODEOWNERS; no cross-team sign-off on internals | High |

For full rule definitions and violation signals: load `references/rules-core-critical.md` or `references/rules-core-standard.md`.
For framework-specific patterns (MF v2, Angular/Native Federation, Single SPA): load `references/rules-toolchain.md`.
For URL routing ownership (shell first segment, MFE deeper paths): load `references/routing-ownership.md`.
For fix patterns and step-by-step remediation: load `references/remediation.md` when the user asks how to fix a violation or requests a migration plan.
For framework-by-framework code generation patterns (React, Angular, Vue, Single SPA): load `references/code-patterns.md`.

---

## Cold start: new project

If no boundaries exist yet, ask about the highest-priority unknown first — one question per turn. Do not generate implementation code until each check is resolved.

**Check 1 — Team ownership**
Ask: "Which team will own this micro-frontend end-to-end — design, development, deployment, and operations?"
**If unresolved:** do not generate implementation code. Ask the user to install the **micro-frontend-canvas** skill and complete a canvas iteration (see https://github.com/lucamezzalira/mfe-canvas).