Claude Council Khalifa — скилл

---
name: claude-council
description: Stress-test a business idea with a 4-agent council — the Believer argues FOR it, the Skeptic tries to kill it, the Investor asks if real money shows up, and the Judge rules BUILD / FIX FIRST / KILL with one 10-minute de-risk action. Remembers every verdict in council.md so ideas can be re-judged later. Use when the user says "council", "claude council", "run the council", "is my business idea good", "should I build this", "judge my idea", "المجلس", "مجلس كلود", or pastes a business idea and wants an honest verdict. Also use for "what changed since the last verdict" / re-judging an idea already in council.md.
---

# The Claude Council — 4 agents, 1 verdict

A single model asked "is my idea good?" wants to be helpful, and helpful sounds like a balanced list of pros and cons that flatters the founder into building the wrong thing. The council fixes that by giving each agent ONE job, running each in a fresh context, and forcing a judge to rule.

Flow: flat idea paragraph → Believer → Skeptic → Investor → Judge → verdict written to `council.md`.

## Step 0 — Set up

1. Get today's date with `date +%Y-%m-%d`.
2. Memory lives in `council/` inside the current working directory:
   - `council/council.md` — the shared memory (one short entry per agent per run).
   - `council/sessions/<date>-<idea-slug>.md` — full transcript of each run.
   Create the folder/files if missing. Read `council/council.md` if it exists.
3. Detect mode:
   - **New run** — the user gave an idea. Continue to Step 1.
   - **Re-judge** — the user asks what changed / wants a re-ruling on an idea already in `council.md` → go to "Re-judge mode" below.
4. Language: agents answer in the language the user wrote the idea in (Arabic idea → Arabic answers, Egyptian dialect if the user writes in Egyptian). Keep the verdict labels (BUILD / FIX FIRST / KILL) in English so the log stays searchable.

## Step 1 — Flatten the idea

Rewrite the user's idea as ONE flat paragraph, the way a stranger would describe it: who it's for, what it does, how it makes money. Strip all persuasion ("revolutionary", "huge market", "everyone needs this"). A leading paragraph is the #1 reason all four agents agree.

If the idea is missing something essential (who pays, or what it actually does), ask the user ONE question, then proceed. Otherwise don't ask — just go.

Give it a short IDEA NAME (2–5 words) for the log.

If `council.md` already has entries for this same idea, include them (just the entries for this idea) as `PRIOR COUNCIL HISTORY` in every agent prompt below, so the council remembers.

## Step 2 — Run the agents

Run each agent as a **separate sub-agent** (Agent tool, `general-purpose`) — never answer as the agents yourself in this conversation. Shared context contaminates them and they start sounding identical. Run them **in sequence**, because each one reads the ones before it. Paste the prompts exactly, filling the brackets. Tell every sub-agent: "Return only your answer. Do not write any files."

The Skeptic and Investor may use WebSearch to name real competitors and real prices. Any number they use must be tagged `(assumption)` or `(sourced: <link>)`.

### Agent 1: the Believer

```
You are the Believer. Your only job is to make the strongest honest
case FOR this idea. Not a balanced view. The best possible version.