Sci Writing GeoRS skill
Four skills for geography and remote sensing papers: drafting, reviews, reviewer responses and an author style profile.
- 59 ★ on the repository
- Last commit
Minimal access
Why this level
- The skills are reference texts and instructions and neither run nor send anything.
Install
- Works in
In your terminal, with SkillFoxx CLI
npx skillfoxx add skills/sci-writing-georsDetects the agents on your machine, shows the access level and pins the version.
Other ways to install
Access and checks
How we reviewMinimal accessThe tool runs nothing and makes no network calls.
- The skills are reference texts and instructions and neither run nor send anything.
This is third-party code. Review the repository files before installing.
What it does
A set of four skills carries a paper from the question of whether it is worth writing to the answer to a reviewer comment. `sci-paper-writing` covers the whole English paper: journal choice, title, abstract, introduction, methods, accuracy validation, results, discussion, figures and cover letter. `geo-review-writing` handles reviews and PRISMA systematic reviews, `geo-reviewer-response` builds a point-by-point reply to reviewers and `geo-writing-style` builds a personal style profile from your own texts. Under the hood sit 19 reference files for the main skill and three paper types: spatiotemporal change, quantitative retrieval and modeling, and observation comparison. A separate section teaches critical writing without stock phrases and states that the goal is accurate text with honest disclosure of AI help, not evading detectors.
Who it is for. Researchers and graduate students in geography, remote sensing, soil science and ecology who write English papers for peer-reviewed journals.
Good fit when
- There is an idea, but it is unclear whether the novelty is enough for the journal.
- The introduction does not narrow from the global scale to the knowledge gap.
- Reviewer comments arrived and the reply must be formatted point by point with page and line numbers.
- A systematic review is prepared per PRISMA 2020 and the structure needs checking.
Not a fit when
- The paper is not written in English.
- The topic is far from Earth sciences and domain techniques will not help.
- You expect the skill to invent data, literature or results.
Example request
Here is an introduction draft for a soil salinity mapping paper: check the structure and mark weak spots without rewriting.Limitations
The skills are written in Chinese while the paper output is English: the agent dialogue language is your choice. By default they only comment on problems and rewrite on explicit request. The author decides data, degree of novelty and strength of conclusions, and the skill marks missing pieces as needing input. Journal rules, quartiles and impact factors change, so take them from the journal site. Each of the four skills must be installed, or the suite archive.
How to disable. Delete the four skill directories from `~/.claude/skills/` (or from your agent skills directory).
FAQ
How do I install the set in Claude Code?
Clone the repository and run `cp -r skills/* ~/.claude/skills/`. Codex uses a different directory, `~/.agents/skills/`. The repository has an `INSTALL.md` with instructions for Kimi, WorkBuddy and other platforms.
How do I confirm the skills installed?
Ask the agent which skills it has and when to use them. It should name all four. If not all appear, the skill may have degraded into a plain prompt.
Can I install just one skill?
Yes, each skill lives in its own directory and ships as a separate archive, plus there is a suite archive.
What about the old version 1?
Delete the old directory before installing: `skill.md` from version 1 conflicts with `SKILL.md` from version 2.
Does the skill hide AI involvement?
No. The AI collaboration section requires disclosing help per journal rules, and cleaning stock phrases from text does not target detectors.
Discussion
No questions or reviews yet.
Related
SkillsA skill set for research work in the style of Nature journals: finding and reading papers, writing, statistics, figures, reviewer responses
27 skills for a scientific manuscript: structure, figures, citations, prose and reviewer replies, from question to submission.
Twelve skills for research work: idea evaluation, literature review, paper text, reviewer rebuttals and figures
A skill for researchers who draft in Chinese: drafts and results become an English manuscript, with citations and claims checked
scientific-writing-zh is a Claude Code skill, a Chinese-language writing coach for papers, revision, reviews and talks.
Eight skills for finished papers and theses in LaTeX and Typst: compile, references, language polish, cover letters and a reviewer-style audit
README in short
Version 2 grew the single skill of version 1 into four and added reviews, reviewer replies and a style profile. The boundaries section forbids inventing data and defaults to comments instead of edits.