PaperJury skill

A skill that stress-tests a research paper before submission: mocks a review, gives a verdict, helps revise and re-verify

  • 1,219 ★ on the repository
  • Last commit
  • MIT
Skill

Minimal access

Why this level

  • The skill analyzes text and gives recommendations, with no action in external systems
All reasons and checks

spark-to-paper-skills/paperjury

Install

In your terminal, with SkillFoxx CLI

npx skillfoxx add skills/paperjury

Detects the agents on your machine, shows the access level and pins the version.

Other ways to install

Access and checks

How we review

Minimal accessThe tool runs nothing and makes no network calls.

  • The skill analyzes text and gives recommendations, with no action in external systems

This is third-party code. Review the repository files before installing.

What it does

PaperJury runs a paper through a mock review before submission. The skill analyzes the work, issues a verdict with comments, helps revise weak spots and then re-verifies the result. It works in four modes: review, verdict, revise and verify, giving the author a reviewer's view in advance. It installs as a Claude Code plugin or by cloning into the skills directory.

Who it is for. For researchers and paper authors preparing a submission for peer review.

Good fit when

  • You want a reviewer's view of a paper before submission
  • You need weak spots analysis and a revision plan
  • You need to re-verify the paper after edits

Not a fit when

  • You need official peer review, not a practice run
  • The work is not a research paper

Example request

Run my paper as a reviewer: give a verdict and a list of comments before submission

Limitations

The skill mocks a review and does not replace real reviewers or a journal decision. Analysis quality depends on the agent's model. It assesses the writing and argument, not experiment reproduction or raw data verification.

How to disable. Uninstall via /plugin or remove the skill folder from ~/.claude/skills.

FAQ

What modes does the skill have?

Review, verdict, revise and verify, to go through the whole cycle before submission.

Does it replace real reviewers?

No, it is a practice run for preparation, not official peer review.

Discussion

No questions or reviews yet.

Skills

A plugin of two skills for a research paper: planning, drafting and revising sections, plus a four-pass manuscript review

PluginMinimal access423Repository stars

Skills tailored to specific academic journals that help choose a venue, prepare a paper and pass review

SkillMinimal access1.4KRepository stars

The paper-spine skill takes a topic, materials and data through a scientific paper: literature, text, figures, review and Word, LaTeX and PDF files

SkillBroad access6.3KRepository stars

A Claude Code skill for research papers: a five-stage pipeline, section rules, a style audit and an independent red-team review.

SkillMinimal access249Repository stars

An orchestrator skill that takes empirical social science work from idea or data to a reproducible manuscript with quality gates.

SkillExtended access50Repository stars

A skill set for academic work: paper review, pre-analysis plan check, grant proposal review, code audit and slide decks.

SkillExtended access560Repository stars

README in short

The README introduces PaperJury as a Claude Code skill for stress-testing a research paper before submission. It works in review, verdict, revise and verify modes, giving the author a reviewer's view in advance. It installs via /plugin commands or by cloning the repository into the skills directory. It has a dedicated project page. MIT licensed.

README badge

Report a problem